char = L;code = 76
Lung volume reduction for severe emphysema: do we need a scalpel or a scope?char = R;code = 82
Publication: Eur Respir Rev 2010 Sep ;19(117)::242-7. :doi: 10.1183/09059180.00005810.
Publication Date: 2010 Sep
Study Author(s): Van Raemdonck, D;Ninane, V;
Institution: Dept of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
[email protected]
Shortcut link to this study:
Resectional lung volume reduction has proven to be superior to medical treatment in reducing dyspnoea and in increasing lung function, survival and quality of life in a very well selected, low risk group of hyperinflated patients with heterogeneous emphysema predominantly in the upper lobe. Nevertheless, this intervention is hampered by an important pulmonary (30%) and cardiovascular (20%) morbidity, mainly as a result of prolonged (>7 days) air leak, and a 5% risk of death as a result of the surgical intervention. Results from ongoing randomised trials are awaited in order to determine whether less invasive, non-resectional lung volume treatment of emphysema via the bronchoscope using endobronchial valves, airway bypass stents or biological adhesives/heated water vapour will yield similar improvement with less morbidity and reduced mortality, compared with surgical resection. Furthermore, it is hoped that endoscopic lung volume reduction techniques may help patients with homogeneous emphysema currently excluded by most teams for the resectional procedure.
PMID: 20956200
How is this determined?
